Type 3 tank: Systemic inconsistency bugs me! - Printable Version +- PG-HQ Forums (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms) +-- Forum: Panzer Grenadier (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Vassal General (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Type 3 tank: Systemic inconsistency bugs me! (/showthread.php?tid=3174)

Type 3 tank: Systemic inconsistency bugs me! - plloyd1010 - 07-09-2026 Systemic inconsistency means rework.  Waltzing Matilda introduced the Type 3. Okay, AT value seems a little off for a 75L38 gun, but not so bad. Then comes Armor of Saipan. Type 1, Type 4, and a new Type 3. A little awkward, but fortunately Japan had two Type 3 designs, the Chi-Nu and Chi-Nu Kai. So make the new Type 3 the Chi-Nu Kai, and put the new tanks in the Axis Specials extension. Not a very elegant solution, but there are only 2 scenarios to consider, so it works. Now there is Pacific Armor and  Mindanao 1945. Type 1, Type 4, and Type 3 is now standardized? All the Japanese armor in Axis Specials need to migrate to OOB Japanese Army 1944-45. Chi-Nu now needs 2 versions, as does the So-Da, and perhaps the Ho-Ni. That leaves 1 half-weird question. What about the Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai (which was never actually produced)? Maybe this in the Axis Specials?     Looks like something that might work with the autogyro... Okay, rant is finished. RE: Type 3 tank: Systemic inconsistency bugs me! - Sonora - 07-15-2026 It wouldn't be APL if it was consistent and unmuddled.