[PG-HQ Dev Blog] Indirect Ratings - Printable Version +- PG-HQ Forums (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms) +-- Forum: Panzer Grenadier (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: PG-HQ Q&A (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: [PG-HQ Dev Blog] Indirect Ratings (/showthread.php?tid=122)

[PG-HQ Dev Blog] Indirect Ratings - Shad - 07-06-2012 One of the upcoming new additions to the Library is indirect ratings. As you know, when you play a scenario you are asked to rate it from 1 to 5. This is the only thing you are directly allowed to rate. However, many other Library objects are involved in a scenario and thus can be indirectly rated by pulling the ratings for the scenarios in which they appear... nations maps battle types conditions etc. While these indirect ratings should be taken with a grain of salt, they are nonetheless interesting to browse and (I believe) enhance the Library by their presence. Two quick examples: Can you guess what the lowest rated condition is? If you said "caves by a mile" you're right! How about units? If we limit the pool of consideration to only those units that have 10 indirect ratings or more, we are left with 629 "well-played" units. Of those, the top ten by average rating are: Nation Branch Unit - Avg Rating (total ratings) America Army M24 - AR: 4.45 (11) Germany SS SPW-250 - AR: 4.33 (12) America Army M39 - AR: 4.3 (10) Soviet Union Guards T-44 - AR: 4.15 (13) Soviet Union Guards JSU-152 - AR: 4.1 (10) France Army 47mm APX - AR: 4 (29) France Army 25mm/CK portee - AR: 4 (17) Soviet Union RKKA JS-II - AR: 4 (10) Italy Army 100mm - AR: 4 (10) Soviet Union RKKA T-70 - AR: 3.96 (28) Any favorites in that list for you? Any oddities?