+- PG-HQ Forums (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms)
+-- Forum: Panzer Grenadier (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: PG-HQ Q&A (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats (/showthread.php?tid=2622)
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - Shad - 05-26-2022
This morning I ran a preliminary test on the records history to compare the impact of moving from 1 play counted per scenario to 1 play counted per side (1, 2, or solo) per scenario.
Impact Summary:
- 287 members have recorded at least 1 play
- 67 of those would be impacted by this change
- 14 of those would get credit for more than 3 additional plays:
- 12 new plays for JayTownsend and Matt W
- 11 new plays for Adepss1
- 9 new plays for enrique, plloyd1010, and Michael Murphy
- 8 new plays for mike perryman
- 5 new plays for waynebaumber and Schoenwulf
- 4 new plays for campsawyer, joe_oppenheimer, Hugmenot, Brett Nicholson, and a player who has chosen to delete their account some time ago
- 12 new plays for JayTownsend and Matt W
As for whether any of those bonus plays result in immediate rank changes, I guess we'll find out on June 1st.
I'll make the back-end code changes over the weekend.
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - plloyd1010 - 05-26-2022
In my case, I just expect to be resargeified.
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - goosebrown - 05-26-2022
Thank you. I think this is a really positive move.
@plloyd1010 that sounds painful...
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - Blackcloud6 - 05-26-2022
![[Image: much-rejoicing.gif]](https://warfareplugins.com/wp-content/uploads/much-rejoicing.gif)
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - Shad - 05-27-2022
I'm glad I used preliminary in the original post because those numbers were wrong. I was counting the winning side rather than the player's side by mistake.
Updated number are as follows:
Impact Summary:
- 287 members have recorded at least 1 play
- 31 of those would be impacted by this change
- 7 of those would get credit for more than 3 additional plays:
- 10 new plays for Brett Nicholson and Matt W
- 9 new plays for waynebaumber
- 7 new plays for plloyd1010
- 5 new plays for Hugmenot and Schoenwulf
- 4 new plays for Dan_Huffman
- 10 new plays for Brett Nicholson and Matt W
Which passes the sniff test, because in the previous calc you were getting credit for playing a scenario solo more than once and having a different side win, which explains Jay getting a bunch of new plays when he's almost exclusively a solo player. The people listed above are all active head-to-head players which is who this ranked calc benefits.
Anyway, there you go!
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - plloyd1010 - 06-02-2022
(05-26-2022, 01:12 AM)plloyd1010 Wrote: In my case, I just expect to be resargeified.
Nope. Missed it by that much!
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - plloyd1010 - 06-12-2022
(05-26-2022, 12:17 AM)Shad Wrote: This morning I ran a preliminary test on the records history to compare the impact of moving from 1 play counted per scenario to 1 play counted per side (1, 2, or solo) per scenario.
Maybe this will help the Competitive Ladder. Now you get credit for each play.
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - treadasaurusrex - 06-15-2022
(05-27-2022, 02:08 AM)Shad Wrote: I'm glad I used preliminary in the original post because those numbers were wrong. I was counting the winning side rather than the player's side by mistake.Is there a timeframe for when online VASSAL shared-players like Peter L. and Wayne B. get their retroactive additional plays added to their totals? For example, I think that Wayne is due 9 more plays as indicated in your preliminary note.
Updated number are as follows:
Impact Summary:
- 287 members have recorded at least 1 play
- 31 of those would be impacted by this change
- 7 of those would get credit for more than 3 additional plays:
- 10 new plays for Brett Nicholson and Matt W
- 9 new plays for waynebaumber
- 7 new plays for plloyd1010
- 5 new plays for Hugmenot and Schoenwulf
- 4 new plays for Dan_Huffman
Which passes the sniff test, because in the previous calc you were getting credit for playing a scenario solo more than once and having a different side win, which explains Jay getting a bunch of new plays when he's almost exclusively a solo player. The people listed above are all active head-to-head players which is who this ranked calc benefits.
Anyway, there you go!
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - waynebaumber - 06-26-2022
(06-15-2022, 05:16 AM)treadasaurusrex Wrote:(05-27-2022, 02:08 AM)Shad Wrote: I'm glad I used preliminary in the original post because those numbers were wrong. I was counting the winning side rather than the player's side by mistake.Is there a timeframe for when online VASSAL shared-players like Peter L. and Wayne B. get their retroactive additional plays added to their totals? For example, I think that Wayne is due 9 more plays as indicated in your preliminary note.
Updated number are as follows:
Impact Summary:
- 287 members have recorded at least 1 play
- 31 of those would be impacted by this change
- 7 of those would get credit for more than 3 additional plays:
- 10 new plays for Brett Nicholson and Matt W
- 9 new plays for waynebaumber
- 7 new plays for plloyd1010
- 5 new plays for Hugmenot and Schoenwulf
- 4 new plays for Dan_Huffman
Which passes the sniff test, because in the previous calc you were getting credit for playing a scenario solo more than once and having a different side win, which explains Jay getting a bunch of new plays when he's almost exclusively a solo player. The people listed above are all active head-to-head players which is who this ranked calc benefits.
Anyway, there you go!
Give this man a medal
