Scenarios played, small & first? - Printable Version +- PG-HQ Forums (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms) +-- Forum: Panzer Grenadier (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Scenarios played, small & first? (/showthread.php?tid=1786) |
RE: Scenarios played, small & first? - Hugmenot - 07-26-2018 Sure but in my case I selected the scenario with the most maps (to a limit of 4) when there was a tie. RE: Scenarios played, small & first? - saracv3 - 07-29-2018 WofR- I hate to admit that I may never play it since I really have a penchant for the EUR o pa stuff- At one time I was nicknamed 'Munch' for munching through Russia as set Fuhrer in Drach Nach Osten. Buuutt.....I might consider a trade for Broken Axis or Burning Tigers. (Sorry I should have gone to different folder.) OK, see other folder for specs. RE: Scenarios played, small & first? - waynebaumber - 08-29-2018 The first scenario that I play is the the one I like the look of most of all normally. I enjoy looking through the scenario books and choosing the best looking scenario to play next. This would normally not be a small scenario. RE: Scenarios played, small & first? - saracv3 - 09-13-2018 I decided to hang on to Restistance. Too good to part with. I'm still looking to play AFV v. AFV and a monster. I'm thinking 4+ boards and a classic panzer div. v. tank div. Eastern Front, 100+ counters, 30+ turns. Saw a 250+ counter, 4 board whopper in March on Lenin. yesterday. BTW, there's a lot more to Kursk: SF than II SS Panzer Corps I would think. Or, it seems the scenarios have been scaled down. Where's the monster within the monster, Prokhorovka? I see many references, but am not sure which scenario could be called the meat of t he battle. Possibly I'll do little research and maybe come away with a Matt Ward type campaign. RE: Scenarios played, small & first? - Hugmenot - 09-14-2018 Kursk: South Flank has some very large scenarios involving lots of tanks. I think scenario 34, With Reckless Abandon, took us 18+ hours to play. Campaigns linking scenarios, be they new or new one, would be appreciated. RE: Scenarios played, small & first? - cjsiam - 09-14-2018 I've run into a Barbarossa Miniatures campaign which runs from June-Sept of 41 by Andrew Rolph...It is based on a Platoon based unit stand, and I think would fit really well with the PG platform....whole series of battles strung together in a campaign.... I'm looking at the maps---how to use a PG map set, or custom to make it work...the battles are Regiment to couple regiment sized...Russians are Randomized formations....pretty nice set up... Turning it into a PG based campaign for Barbarossa, potentially multi-player, is where I'm looking to go with it. https://www.wargamevault.com/product/241229/Barbarossa--Kicking-in-the-Door RE: Scenarios played, small & first? - richvalle - 09-14-2018 I could be interested in a multiplayer game. I'd even buy the pdf. I have a, possibly outdated, box of Command Decision on my game shelf. RE: Scenarios played, small & first? - zaarin7 - 09-17-2018 There was a book like that done for GDW's Command Decision back in the day. It might be based on that. In any event will be a purchase in the near future. |