+- PG-HQ Forums (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms)
+-- Forum: Panzer Grenadier (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire (/showthread.php?tid=577)
Pages:
1
2
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - campsawyer - 07-19-2013
I don't believe that anyone is advocating changing existing scenarios. Just the fact that there is many historical instances that it was used as BF instead of DF and why.
The only one that can answer this question is Mike B. I probably should have phrased it better, but one could use a different BF number for the scenarios, if they want. I would even dare to say that some scenario developer could put in an SSR to use this for a specific scenario. So no wholesale changes.
BTW, Peter, nice mosaic of PG counters. Organization and coloring is nice, could be a good marketing tool, if APL marketed.
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - Shad - 07-19-2013
(07-18-2013, 03:35 PM)warstudent Wrote: That unit is the M8 Greyhound. See pic on the link below about the vehicle. The 2 vents on the rear match the counter
http://www.dday-overlord.com/eng/greyhound_tank.htm
My fault. I stuck the image into his post.
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - vince hughes - 07-19-2013
(07-19-2013, 02:43 AM)plloyd1010 Wrote:I must be suffering from some form of dementia. Vince's post seems to say he agrees with me.
LOL
Peter, you write many things I agree with. Its just that I don't normally post when I am in agreement with something (I suppose I could do that +1 thing which seems so popular these days
)
RE: M8 Scott and Indirect Fire - Matt W - 07-20-2013
"I suppose I could do that +1 thing which seems so popular these days "
+1