The Korean War Series Project! - Printable Version +- PG-HQ Forums (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms) +-- Forum: Panzer Grenadier (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: The Korean War Series Project! (/showthread.php?tid=1142) |
RE: The Korean War Series Project! - dirk - 11-30-2017 Jay, question on the Chinese leadership - looking at the scenarios can the Chinese activate NKPA units? If so Can the NKPA leaders activate Chinese units RE: The Korean War Series Project! - plloyd1010 - 11-30-2017 Humble pie? I only corrected one little mistake, which has no bearing on the scenario. That is a pretty small slice. ;-) The OBA question though is important. RE: The Korean War Series Project! - JayTownsend - 11-30-2017 (11-30-2017, 12:31 PM)dirk Wrote: Jay, question on the Chinese leadership - looking at the scenarios can the Chinese activate NKPA units? If so Can the NKPA leaders activate Chinese units Good question Dirk. Similar to Counter-Attacks Special Rule #27. Chinese (CCP) & North Korean (NKPA) leaders may only affect each other's subordinate leaders, but not the units themselves. RE: The Korean War Series Project! - dirk - 11-30-2017 Then can you explain the NKPA SMG units in the Chinese OOB. RE: The Korean War Series Project! - JayTownsend - 11-30-2017 (11-30-2017, 12:59 PM)dirk Wrote: Then can you explain the NKPA SMG units in the Chinese OOB. Yes, there aren't enough Soviet SMG units/counters in Broken Axis to represent the Chinese units, so I just used the NKPA SMG units/counters to fill in and represent more Chinese SMG units/counters. RE: The Korean War Series Project! - dirk - 11-30-2017 That make sense, thank you. RE: The Korean War Series Project! - plloyd1010 - 12-01-2017 Dumb question, probably for Jay, since he has read more on this side of the subject, but open to anyone. Chinese command references didn't follow the western concept until the mid 1950's, so I presume that during the Korean War the Chinese army was using using command references instead of actual ranks. Firstly, is that so? Assuming the first is yes, the second question becomes, what to use for "ranks"? Some I've heard, others not so sure: Colonel = Comrade Regiment Leader Commander Lt. Colonel = Comrade Asst. Regiment Leader/Commander? Major = Comrade Battalion Leader Commander Captain = Comrade Company Leader Commander Lieutenant = Comrade Platoon Leader Sergeant = Comrade? Kommissar = Comrade Commissioner? Any ideas? RE: The Korean War Series Project! - JayTownsend - 12-01-2017 (12-01-2017, 03:21 AM)plloyd1010 Wrote: Dumb question, probably for Jay, since he has read more on this side of the subject, but open to anyone. Chinese command references didn't follow the western concept until the mid 1950's, so I presume that during the Korean War the Chinese army was using using command references instead of actual ranks. Firstly, is that so? RE: The Korean War Series Project! - plloyd1010 - 12-01-2017 I saw those. The Dictionary of Contemporary Chinese Military History, p173, says that conventional ranks were not adopted until 1955. (the page is in the preview.) The Wikipedia article alludes to that too. Simple is okay. I am also thinking of my WW2 Chinese counters. RE: The Korean War Series Project! - JayTownsend - 12-05-2017 I have been erased! http://www.avalanchepress.com/PusanPreview.php Ok, just kidding. |