Designer ranking his own scenarios?

[Shad]

Vince your proposal has perfect logic in a world where the PG designer has the final say in his scenario content and what he turns in to Avalanche is exactly what is published, but that is not the world we live in. I dare say the honorable David Murray would not be bestowing 4s and 5s upon the Cassino scenarios that came in the box.

I also strongly doubt that Jay (or anyone, I'm not singling you out buddy) is play-testing every single scenario that gets turned in. If you're capable of consistently designing 4 or 5 star scenarios without even trying them, well, you should start your own wargame company!

So, in summation, I think designers should be playing their own published scenarios and should be rating them and most certainly should be including AARs.

Now, does anyone outside of the three of us care?