(09-15-2012, 09:36 PM)plloyd1010 Wrote: Yes, Drew, we do. I and my boss, and his boss think it is stupid.
As an old HR guy, I suppose I hold personal evaluations (& 360 degree evaluations) in a higher regard than most.
Quote:Amongst the sea of self promoters, and with design expectations, it really is best if designers stay out of the ratings game.
To me the crux of the issue is whether it is obvious that Rater/Reviewer A is actually the person behind Game B. If there is a disconnect or some deception there then we have a problem. But I maintain that to expect or even demand silence does nothing productive.
Quote:BtW, that thesis, did you really think your grading the paper was about your writing & research?
The professor graded us wholly independently of our own evaluations. The point was to learn to critically evaluate our own performance. As you older generations are so found of pointing out, us post-1980 kids grew up in the
everyone-gets-a-trophy period and are often ill-equipped for the
not-niceties of The Real World.
