Battle Games Poll?

[Hugmenot]

I usually just play the scenarios in a section and look at the end of the segment to see if the won that particular Battle Game or not. Usually I am just trying to win the scenario not think about the long term breakdown of the Battle Games. 

The Battle Games are more for those who will play the linked scenarios as a whole, trying to achieve higher level objectives while still trying to win the scenarios.

Checking the battle game conditions only after playing the scenarios may be still interesting reading but putting any value on which side won the battle is silly in my opinion because you were not focused (or aware) on the higher level objectives.

But I feel they are good reading material. 
Matt deserves all the credits. It was his idea and he writes all the battle games.

So do the Battles games add value or just take up space and resources. But there are certainly more options than just that, so I created a poll, just to see what people/players think about them and if AP should continue with them.
Waste of space: that's a valid opinion. Some people like Battle Games, others don't care at all for them.

Waste of resources: The relationship between an organization (company) and its volunteers is always a fragile one. Do you think an organization should tell a volunteer to stop doing what he or she likes doing and expect that volunteer to give the same amount of time of effort on a new task of the organization's choosing?  I learned the answer to that question more than 30 years ago.