PG-HQ Forums › Panzer Grenadier › General Discussion v
'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets
11-09-2013, 06:27 AM,
#20
guyriessen Offline
Recruit
**
 		Posts: 17
Threads: 3
Joined: Jun 2012
RE: 'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets
(11-08-2013, 08:05 PM)Shad Wrote:
(11-08-2013, 02:21 AM)larry marak Wrote: Bulletin...8:19 am PST.

Secret Weapons has been reprinted with a new cover and the required listings on the cover has been corrected. Lightning service!

Do we get a cut of the proceeds for doing the proofing?
Were the 19 cases of errata we've discovered fixed?

Somehow my gut tells me the answer to both those questions is... NO!Rolleyes

Sure! You've already received the standard wargame-proofers pay rate...and the standard play-testers pay rate for discovering the errata as well. Now don't go spending it all in one place!
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: 'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets - by guyriessen - 11-09-2013, 06:27 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)