Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets
11-05-2013, 03:24 AM,
#3
RE: 'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets
I have mixed feelings about the subject. I like geomorphic maps and have few compunctions about mixing my games (any of my games), so long as I can sort them out again. On the other had, the lack of clarity with AP's requirements sometimes makes supplements feel like a marketing cheat. I would feel better about it if there were something like the PG-HQ checklist for the modules. Something like 3 scenarios require BtB pieces and BB maps, 2 Scenarios require RtB maps & pieces, and EFD and RTB maps. So that I know I could play 14 out of 20 scenarios with what I had on hand. While I can play everything I have, I wonder how many new players are discouraged from expanding their collections because of on going purchase requirements.
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat! Winking
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: 'Controversial' View on Supplements Using Multi-Sets - by plloyd1010 - 11-05-2013, 03:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)