PG-HQ Forums › Panzer Grenadier › PG-HQ Q&A v
A question about the errata system

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
A question about the errata system
11-15-2012, 06:28 PM,
#5
Shad Offline
General of the Army
*******
 		Posts: 2,220
Threads: 289
Joined: May 2012
RE: A question about the errata system
(11-15-2012, 06:27 AM)larry marak Wrote: Another nagging question. How come Hopeless but not Serious has a dozen AFV rules listed as applicable to scenario one when the only vehicles used in scenario one are Austrian trucks?

I've adjusted this. Now if there are only trucks present then only one AFV-related rule is displayed: that regarding vulnerability to AT fire which does apply because trucks have an AT value of -1.

See HbnS001 now...
...came for the cardboard, stayed for the camaraderie...
Website Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A question about the errata system - by Shad - 10-27-2012, 11:23 AM
RE: A question about the errata system - by Shad - 11-15-2012, 06:28 PM
RE: A question about the errata system - by Shad - 11-15-2012, 08:40 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)