Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Action Phase - is this sequence correct?
08-07-2023, 04:42 PM,
#14
RE: Action Phase - is this sequence correct?
(08-07-2023, 08:20 AM)Tony M Wrote: One of my complaints about previous tactical games I've played is that they don't include leaders. Leaders--NCOs and officers--are an essential element in small-unit actions. Maybe my only criticism of The Gamers' TCS series is that the games didn't have leaders.

For me this is perhaps a case of "be careful what you wish for," because of the confusion I am experiencing with the PG system. I suspect I will be playing the scenario Odessa: Hill 101 over and over for a long time!
One thing I very much like about the PG system is how command structure breaks down under stress and frictions. A couple of leaders are disrupted or demoralized, now you see how good your planning really was and how your army performs.
treadasaurusrex, joe_oppenheimer, Schoenwulf And 7 others like this post
... More and more, people around the world are coming to realize that the world is flat! Winking
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Action Phase - is this sequence correct? - by plloyd1010 - 08-07-2023, 04:42 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)