Poll: How should scenario plays be recorded for player stats
You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
| Once per scenario |
11.11% |
1 |
11.11% |
| Once per side played in a scanario |
0% |
0 |
0% |
| Once per side played in a scenario INCLUDING once for solo play |
88.89% |
8 |
88.89% |
Thread Rating:
- 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
|
How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats
|
|
06-26-2022, 05:13 PM,
|
|
|
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats
(06-15-2022, 05:16 AM)treadasaurusrex Wrote: (05-27-2022, 02:08 AM)Shad Wrote: I'm glad I used preliminary in the original post because those numbers were wrong. I was counting the winning side rather than the player's side by mistake.
Updated number are as follows:
Impact Summary:- 287 members have recorded at least 1 play
- 31 of those would be impacted by this change
- 7 of those would get credit for more than 3 additional plays:
- 10 new plays for Brett Nicholson and Matt W
- 9 new plays for waynebaumber
- 7 new plays for plloyd1010
- 5 new plays for Hugmenot and Schoenwulf
- 4 new plays for Dan_Huffman
Which passes the sniff test, because in the previous calc you were getting credit for playing a scenario solo more than once and having a different side win, which explains Jay getting a bunch of new plays when he's almost exclusively a solo player. The people listed above are all active head-to-head players which is who this ranked calc benefits.
Anyway, there you go! Is there a timeframe for when online VASSAL shared-players like Peter L. and Wayne B. get their retroactive additional plays added to their totals? For example, I think that Wayne is due 9 more plays as indicated in your preliminary note.
Give this man a medal 
goosebrown likes this post
|
|
|
|
| Messages In This Thread |
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats - by waynebaumber - 06-26-2022, 05:13 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
