|
RE: How should PG-HQ count scenario plays for player stats
I think this conversation for me is like a Rorschach test and I see myself in it. I am a rules guy. Not to the extent that I slavishly follow rules, I would prefer to agree with my opponent and pick the rules that we use, However; I am a rules guy in as much as it represents a system and I love systems. For me I think this system is skewed a little and should be tweaked to be a better representation of knowledge. I believe in depth and I think that playing both sides represents depth and understanding.
I like that.
As for the scores and the counts, I don't pay much attention to them although I would like to get the chevrons at some point. But how these scores are obtained to me means how in depth I understand or my opponent understands a game or scenario.
But in the end it is all academic. I just love playing with you guys so how ever it works out, I'll see you on the Vassal-field.
P.S. It's all about the AARs...
User Experience begins with You...
Always looking for people to play PzGdr, Napoleonic Games, and Great War at Sea
(the Vassal for GWAS Mediterranean specifically).
|
