Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[PG-HQ Dev Blog] Indirect Ratings
07-06-2012, 11:23 AM,
#1
Information  [PG-HQ Dev Blog] Indirect Ratings
One of the upcoming new additions to the Library is indirect ratings. As you know, when you play a scenario you are asked to rate it from 1 to 5. This is the only thing you are directly allowed to rate. However, many other Library objects are involved in a scenario and thus can be indirectly rated by pulling the ratings for the scenarios in which they appear...
  • nations
  • maps
  • battle types
  • conditions
  • etc.
While these indirect ratings should be taken with a grain of salt, they are nonetheless interesting to browse and (I believe) enhance the Library by their presence.

Two quick examples:

Can you guess what the lowest rated condition is?

If you said "caves by a mile" you're right!

How about units?

If we limit the pool of consideration to only those units that have 10 indirect ratings or more, we are left with 629 "well-played" units. Of those, the top ten by average rating are:
Nation Branch Unit - Avg Rating (total ratings)
  1. America Army M24 - AR: 4.45 (11)
  2. Germany SS SPW-250 - AR: 4.33 (12)
  3. America Army M39 - AR: 4.3 (10)
  4. Soviet Union Guards T-44 - AR: 4.15 (13)
  5. Soviet Union Guards JSU-152 - AR: 4.1 (10)
  6. France Army 47mm APX - AR: 4 (29)
  7. France Army 25mm/CK portee - AR: 4 (17)
  8. Soviet Union RKKA JS-II - AR: 4 (10)
  9. Italy Army 100mm - AR: 4 (10)
  10. Soviet Union RKKA T-70 - AR: 3.96 (28)

Any favorites in that list for you? Any oddities? Smile
...came for the cardboard, stayed for the camaraderie...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[PG-HQ Dev Blog] Indirect Ratings - by Shad - 07-06-2012, 11:23 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)