(10-28-2015, 07:03 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: Generally, I like to set the defense, let it simmer for a bit, then make adjustments (fortunately, a luxury of solo play).
I am the same way.
(10-28-2015, 07:03 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: I don't want to get into a debate about "best" set-up, but one of the aspects of solo play that I like is the ability to try things out with no need to worry about ego or face and "winning."
Same here; I have replayed some scenarios up to 5 times to experience the effects of various setups. And I still struggle playing the defending side.
I once posted pictures of my setup and wrote whether they were effective. No time to continue this practice unfortunately.
(10-28-2015, 07:03 AM)Poor Yorek Wrote: As for your question about rule set, I am generally playing 4th Ed. now (not that I have been playing much), though I prefer the 3rd Ed. Assault Table (although I have my "issues" with the lower cols even with the 3rd). I have a very different opinion in that regard from, say, Matt and Daniel who, I think - if I may put words in their mouths based on recollection of previous posts - prefer the newer version.
I do indeed much prefer the 4th edition Assault Table. Definitely harder to plan the perfect attacking stacks due to the increased variability at low odds.
