08-14-2013, 06:49 PM,
|
|
Shad
General of the Army
|
Posts: 2,247
Threads: 293
Joined: May 2012
|
|
Visualizing PG-HQ's data
After dragging my feet for... too long, I have gone and fixed the Coverage Completion chart:
This took so long because the graphing library driving that chart was completely rebuilt and improved by the author (who is not me, clearly), and that meant fixing the chart would require refactoring my own plugin interface code.
Anyways, that's done and it is now running properly.
While I'm on the subject, and while the depths of that library are still fresh in my brain, I'm curious if anyone has opinions on what else we should graphilate here at PG-HQ?
Membership growth?
Personal shared play win-loss ratio?
Player rank?
Personal collection completion coverage? (that might be too depressing for most of us )
What do you think?
...came for the cardboard, stayed for the camaraderie...
|
|
08-15-2013, 12:10 AM,
|
|
Matt W
Lieutenant Colonel
|
Posts: 1,037
Threads: 22
Joined: Jun 2012
|
|
RE: Visualizing PG-HQ's data
Well, it might be that Alan, Daniel and I are the only ones to really venture into the campaigns but I have to agree that these are the most significant part of the PG universe that does not have a home on PG-HQ (except for the two Cassino and one King's Officers "scenarios" that are multi-day campaigns). As the campaigns will vary considerably from play to play the format is obviously substantially different from the individual scenario items. I am finding, however, that the opportunity to shape the battles gives one more of an operational context for the battles and requires one to actually husband one's forces far more than in a typical scenario.
Since I tend to be far less capable from a technical standpoint, the pictures aren't as much a draw for me, however, I realize that I am somewhat of a Luddite in this area...
No "minor" country left behind...
|
|
|