PG-HQ Forums
PGHQ Team: Luftwaffe PARA & INF - Printable Version

+- PG-HQ Forums (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms)
+-- Forum: Panzer Grenadier (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.pg-hq.com/comms/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: PGHQ Team: Luftwaffe PARA & INF (/showthread.php?tid=694)



PGHQ Team: Luftwaffe PARA & INF - vince hughes - 01-20-2014

One for the PG-HQ Team:

Apologies if I am being blind, but looking through the library's 'units' section, I can not see any Luftwaffe PARA or PARA MG's.

There are Luftwaffe INF and MG's, but I can not see the PARA's anywhere. I was trying to find a list of the scenarios they take part in.


RE: PGHQ Team: Luftwaffe PARA & INF - Brett Nicholson - 01-20-2014

(01-20-2014, 09:54 PM)vince hughes Wrote: One for the PG-HQ Team:

Apologies if I am being blind, but looking through the library's 'units' section, I can not see any Luftwaffe PARA or PARA MG's.

There are Luftwaffe INF and MG's, but I can not see the PARA's anywhere. I was trying to find a list of the scenarios they take part in.

I believe they are under the 'Fallshirmmjager' units category, seperate from standard Luftwaffe ground troops. I know they are in a few 'Battle of the Bulge' scenarios.


RE: PGHQ Team: Luftwaffe PARA & INF - campsawyer - 01-20-2014

Vince,

Here is a link to the German PARA's

Fallschirmjager

They are also on the list of units at the very top of the Germany section.


RE: PGHQ Team: Luftwaffe PARA & INF - vince hughes - 01-21-2014

NoE 5 is the next one from that series that Wayne and I will play. The set-up looks zehr interessant ! A bit of a 'mix'.


RE: PGHQ Team: Luftwaffe PARA & INF - vince hughes - 01-21-2014

Thanks everybody


RE: PGHQ Team: Luftwaffe PARA & INF - Poor Yorek - 01-21-2014

^^ Vince,

We must have overlapped in posting: I deleted my message as I belatedly (blame it on not yet having my coffee) realized your question was directed at finding Site information, not the physical counters. So decided to take down the post, but guess you read it first. Sorry.

But, yes, that scenario looks interesting, very interesting. Note the US leader draw is suggestive.